.
Dear,
Andrew's Restoration Ltd. was incepted in 1996, We have not only met customer expectations but have often exceeded them.
First and foremost it must be understood that pre existing conditions are beyond our control.
Let me review where you have put blame on us that is unjustified:
* we performed the work specified in our written agreement in full.
* we attended the site upon your request regarding your concerns, namely that one of cracks in the stair treads had re cracked in the spring. Inspection revealed that your front entrance installation had a second portion added to it, and this section had separated from the original. At the time you agreed with my assessment and the direction that would be required to remedy the situation (work that we do not do).
* in spite of your agreement regarding the content of our meeting you later became insistent that we reeturn and redo the work in this location.
* you unreasonably expect us to assume responsibility for work of poor integrity that was performed by another company.
* when you contacted us the second season after the repairs were completed with a concern that the parging "looked like it would fail", I offered to come and perform a definitive test to establish whether or not this was likely and you did not respond.
* your statement that the repairs have further deteriorated (beyond the original crack that had re opened) are simply not truthful, as photo documentation of my original site visit and a second one after you wrote your review clearly show.
Repairs of another company's work are not necessarily warrantable, especially when some of the work cannot be seen. Having stated this, we have always extended good will beyond what we should. However, to redo the repair in the location of concern would yield no better results and is therefore a wasted effort.